From: Marek Kowalski (MPKowalski@lbl.gov)
Date: Mon Jul 12 2004 - 10:06:35 PDT
Saul Perlmutter wrote:
> Hi over there! Two thoughts:
> 1) Have you guys had a chance to check to see if the coordinates that
> Mobasher gave for the 0.48 galaxy might be consistant with the very
> small galaxy just to the left of our candidate (a few times further
> away than the distance between the two nucleii of our candidate's host?
Hi Saul,
indeed, the coordinates for the high z candidate are about as consistent
with that small galaxy as they are with our candidate host. The other
coordinates are far off. So the situdation is unclear. I have attached a
snapshot of the field with Mobashers proposed coordinaes included: the
lower left circle is supposingly the high z galaxy, while the upper is
the low z one.
Marek
>
> 2) Before we talk on the conference call, we probably want to be
> check again the few marginal candidates with about the right magnitude
> for z = 1.2 -- 1.7 (perhaps ask Mobasher for a quick-and-dirty
> redshift?), just because we have so few candidates this time compared
> to last time -- and we would like to be sure that any good candidates
> that we consider following are on our list as well as theirs.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jul 12 2004 - 10:07:21 PDT