Re: Choice of which candidates to prioritize for careful "handwork" photo-z's from Mobasher.

From: Rachel G. (gibbo@panisse.lbl.gov)
Date: Mon Apr 05 2004 - 19:26:08 PDT

  • Next message: Greg Aldering: "Response from Mobasher on acs04-076"

    Sorry everyone, I'm very behind on e-mail. I'll update
    myself on which candidates are being sent and have been
    sent for photo-z.

    I'm worried I haven't seen, for example, candidates like
    176 and 177 and 185 being sent to Bahram. The mags *I* say
    are too bright for these can't be trusted right now.

    Can I assume anything above that "grey" line on the Wiki
    dividing the Good Candidates means something?

    Rachel

    On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Robert A. Knop Jr. wrote:

    > On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 07:19:06PM -0700, Saul Perlmutter wrote:
    > > These were somewhat arbitrarily chosen to be candidates that are not
    > > right next to the edge of an image, and not right near the core of their
    > > host. I don't have any further info (from Rachel and Rob) about what
    > > they think is going on on these or the other candidates of ours that
    > > Adam's team didn't find. This might help us decide which photo-z's to
    > > ask for next.
    >
    > We have put information into the Wiki on these, when we thought we had
    > something to add relative to what people had already posted there.
    > Please go look there. If we found a candidate that we thought was not
    > real, we stated it there.
    >
    > Also see the message I sent out a while back about a couple of specific
    > candidates.
    >
    > -Rob
    >
    > --
    > --Prof. Robert Knop
    > Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University
    > robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 05 2004 - 19:26:33 PDT