From: Saul Perlmutter (saul@lbl.gov)
Date: Wed May 15 2002 - 20:09:11 PDT
Hi Rob et al, Isobel and I agree with you that we should try to get the
ones on your list first. We will first target the Subaru ones on your
list, since they will be harder for VLT, and the go on to the others (if
Chris tells us he hasn't gotten them first). Of course, the HST one
will need to be done at highest priority (S02-075).
__________________________________________________________________
Saul Perlmutter Phone: (510) 486-5203
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory 50-232 Fax: (510) 486-5401
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720 E-mail: saul@LBL.gov
__________________________________________________________________
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Robert A. Knop Jr. wrote:
> > I just talked to Saul on the phone. He suggests trying to get spectra in
> > rough order of brightness, brightest first. This is because the brighter
> > ones are the ones that are most likely to end up with lightcurves, and
> > will allow us to get some idea of rates and results from these searches
> > down to a certain magnitude range. Does that sound reasonable?
> >
> > T Gemini we will be trying to get S02-075 tonight, the one that was set to
> > HST without spectroscopic confirmation. We will also try some of the other
> > brighter Subaru SNe. If we dont manage to get S02-075 tonight (our last
> > chance until June!) then perhaps VLT should try to get it tomorrow night
> > as it transits.
>
> What sort of followup will Subaru be getting? Unless they have followup
> lightcurve time, afteR S02-075 I'd say that higher priority should go to
> the bright supernovae observed with TNG, since we are already getting
> some lightcurve followup of those. The supernovae that we got with TNG
> are:
>
> S02-058
> T02-028
> T02-037 (already have spectrum)
> T02-030
> T02-029
> S02-064 (already have spectrum)
> T02-047
>
> -Rob
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed May 15 2002 - 20:09:25 PDT