From: DAHowell@lbl.gov
Date: Wed May 08 2002 - 13:52:06 PDT
Rob,
Can you get rid of the junk names, or at least start them at 100? We
are repeating names from last year. For example we have a real SN named
junk 15 from last year (see the spectroscopy web page), and below I see
we have a new candidate also named junk 15. This is very confusing.
-Andy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert A. Knop Jr." <robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu>
Date: Wednesday, May 8, 2002 1:37 pm
Subject: Re: Cross-telescope CFHT candidates
> Added C02-027, which was found by Gerson. Low %INC, but it looks real
> (off center, nice galaxy). Probably not terribly high redshift,
> and may
> even be a II given that the galaxy looks like a disk or lenticular
> galaxy. This one will probably be visible on the 25 minute CFHT
> exposure, becuase it's pretty bright.
>
> Still haven't junked the junks; that will be later.
>
> CFHT people, when you find one compare to this list to see if it
> alreadyhas a C02-xxx name.
>
> name1 name2 RA2000 Dec2000 Mag Apsig %INC
> -------------------------------------------------------
> C02-017 junk007 14:00:28.7 +05:19:57.6 23.23 9.10 20
> C02-018 junk008 13:59:50.8 +05:19:26.3 22.51 17.66 22
> C02-019 cand0007 14:02:09.2 +05:21:13.4 23.28 8.84 15
>
> C02-020 Dwalin 14:00:26.8 +04:34:53.3 23.93 6.50 50
> C02-022 cand0012 13:59:50.2 +04:59:36.0 23.32 12.03 16
> C02-023 junk015 14:00:39.1 +04:52:20.1 23.86 7.32 28
>
> C02-024 cand0013 14:02:07.8 +04:43:12.3 23.68 8.95 40
> C02-025 cand0014 14:01:44.4 +05:21:21.4 24.40 5.26 40
> C02-026 cand0015 14:01:10.0 +05:19:50.4 24.13 6.77 25
> C02-027 cand0017 14:02:10.6 +04:52:14.5 23.04 16.25 15
>
> -Rob
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed May 08 2002 - 13:52:23 PDT