Re: grism angle

From: Marek Kowalski (MPKowalski@lbl.gov)
Date: Mon Jul 12 2004 - 16:29:32 PDT

  • Next message: Rachel A. Gibbons: "Re: grism angle"

    Patuxent/-029 will be much harder since the dispersion will pass close to the galaxy center. The optimal roll angle for 029 is the least optimal for 014, unfortunatly.
    Marek

    Robert A. Knop Jr. wrote:

    >On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 04:17:43PM -0700, Tony Spadafora wrote:
    >
    >
    >>Do you know if this turns out to also work for Patuxent/-029?
    >>
    >>
    >
    >Well, we have very little freedom (+-5deg) in the grism angle anyway,
    >and clearly we're going to choose what we choose for the primary
    >target.
    >
    >-Rob
    >
    >
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jul 12 2004 - 16:30:19 PDT