Re: grism angle

From: Robert A. Knop Jr. (robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Mon Jul 12 2004 - 16:30:33 PDT

Next message: Saul Perlmutter: "Re: we should call"

Previous message: Rachel A. Gibbons: "Re: grism angle"
In reply to: Marek Kowalski: "Re: grism angle"
Next in thread: Rachel A. Gibbons: "Re: grism angle"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 04:29:32PM -0700, Marek Kowalski wrote:
> Patuxent/-029 will be much harder since the dispersion will pass close to
> the galaxy center. The optimal roll angle for 029 is the least optimal for
> 014, unfortunatly.

Also, the optimal angle for 029 isn't even available/possible.

-Rob

Next message: Saul Perlmutter: "Re: we should call"
Previous message: Rachel A. Gibbons: "Re: grism angle"
In reply to: Marek Kowalski: "Re: grism angle"
Next in thread: Rachel A. Gibbons: "Re: grism angle"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jul 12 2004 - 16:31:20 PDT