Re: grism angle

From: Robert A. Knop Jr. (robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Mon Jul 12 2004 - 16:19:49 PDT

Next message: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "we should call"

Previous message: Tony Spadafora: "Re: grism angle"
In reply to: Tony Spadafora: "Re: grism angle"
Next in thread: Marek Kowalski: "Re: grism angle"
Reply: Marek Kowalski: "Re: grism angle"
Reply: Rachel A. Gibbons: "Re: grism angle"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 04:17:43PM -0700, Tony Spadafora wrote:
> Do you know if this turns out to also work for Patuxent/-029?

Well, we have very little freedom (+-5deg) in the grism angle anyway,
and clearly we're going to choose what we choose for the primary
target.

-Rob

-- 
--Prof. Robert Knop
  Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University
  robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu

Next message: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "we should call"
Previous message: Tony Spadafora: "Re: grism angle"
In reply to: Tony Spadafora: "Re: grism angle"
Next in thread: Marek Kowalski: "Re: grism angle"
Reply: Marek Kowalski: "Re: grism angle"
Reply: Rachel A. Gibbons: "Re: grism angle"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jul 12 2004 - 16:20:34 PDT