Re: grism angle

From: Tony Spadafora (ALSpadafora@lbl.gov)
Date: Mon Jul 12 2004 - 16:17:43 PDT

  • Next message: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "Re: grism angle"

    Do you know if this turns out to also work for Patuxent/-029?

    -Tony

    On Jul 12, 2004, at 3:23 PM, Robert A. Knop Jr. wrote:

    > We got pretty lucky with the grism angle. The grism angle can be
    > between 76 and 86 (roll angle 78-88). WE *want* 94, but as low as 86
    > is
    > OK. Higher is always better.
    >
    > See :
    >
    >
    > http://brahms.phy.vanderbilt.edu/scp-twiki/pub/ACS2004/
    > CandNameacs04cd014/grismangle.jpg
    >
    > (Also attached to the candidate Wiki page.)
    >
    > -Rob
    >
    > --
    > --Prof. Robert Knop
    > Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University
    > robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jul 12 2004 - 16:18:25 PDT