From: Saul Perlmutter (saul@lbl.gov)
Date: Mon Jul 12 2004 - 10:27:38 PDT
...We were considering asking Mobasher for fast-and-dirty photo-z's for
-010 "star"
-009 "AGN"
-018 "CR enhanced"
with the idea being that these would give us a little more confidence in
our identification of what these events are.
What do you think -- any reason not to, or any more like that to add?
Robert A. Knop Jr. wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 09:44:21AM -0700, Saul Perlmutter wrote:
>
>
>>1) Have you guys had a chance to check to see if the coordinates that
>>Mobasher gave for the 0.48 galaxy might be consistant with the very
>>small galaxy just to the left of our candidate (a few times further away
>>than the distance between the two nucleii of our candidate's host?
>>
>>
>
>No. Mobasher's latest response wasn't too clear. I figure that for
>this one, we can see what Adam's got, because he and Mobasher talked in
>person and could make sure they were talking about the same object. If
>Mobasher is on the phone, then, we can push him to make sure we've got
>the right object.
>
>
>
>>2) Before we talk on the conference call, we probably want to be check
>>again the few marginal candidates with about the right magnitude for z =
>>1.2 -- 1.7 (perhaps ask Mobasher for a quick-and-dirty redshift?), just
>>because we have so few candidates this time compared to last time -- and
>>we would like to be sure that any good candidates that we consider
>>following are on our list as well as theirs.
>>
>>
>
>We're working on confirming things.
>
>We went through everything, and the junk really is junk.
>
>-Rob
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jul 12 2004 - 10:28:24 PDT