From: Saul Perlmutter (saul@lbl.gov)
Date: Mon May 24 2004 - 16:32:17 PDT
Hmm... that's surprising, Bahram. I'll attach an image showing the
neighborhood of this host galaxy (with a circle on the host galaxy).
It looks like there is a clear galaxy right at the coordinates we
sent. Is it easy for you to tell if this matches something in your
catalog (and if not, why not)?
Bahram Mobasher wrote:
>Hi Saul
>
>The closest object to the coordinate you provided is at
>
>z(phot) = 0.44
>95% conf. interval: 0.13 - 0.64
>Sprctral type: Sc
>this object is at Delta(ra) = 1.06812E-4 Delta(Dec) = 9.15527E-05 from
>your specified coordinate.
>
>There is another object at
>Delta(ra) = 7.01904E-4 Delta(Dec) = 6.75201E-04
>this has:
>
>z(phot) = 1.70
>95% confidence interval: 1.35 - 2.06
>Sp. type: starburst
>
>This second object is obviously furrther away from the host
>galaxy coordinate you provided.
>
>Bahram
>
>****************************************************************************
>* * *
>* Bahram Mobasher * Phone: (410) 338 4974 *
>* Space Telescope Science Institute * *
>* 3700 San Martin Drive * fax: (410) 338 5090 *
>* Baltimore MD 21218 * *
>* USA * email: mobasher@stsci.edu *
>* * *
>****************************************************************************
>
>
>On Mon, 24 May 2004, Saul Perlmutter wrote:
>
>
>
>>Hi Bahram,
>> Thanks again for you help with this run. It looks likely that we
>>will not follow any of the supernova, since aside from that z~1.45 one
>>there isn't much that looks good for very-high-redshift. However, for
>>completeness, we're still checking out a few more very faint
>>candidates. Would you mind checking the "quick and dirty" photo-z for
>>this candidate (likely the last we'll be asking about this run):
>>
>> acs04b-002 12:37:08.74 / +62:20:47.53
>>
>>Thank you! --Saul
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 24 2004 - 16:33:12 PDT