One additional request for a quick-and-dirty photo-z.

From: Saul Perlmutter (saul@lbl.gov)
Date: Mon May 24 2004 - 12:16:25 PDT

Next message: Tony Spadafora: "Fwd from Bahram: Re: One additional request for a quick-and-dirty photo-z."

Previous message: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "the two we didn't get"
Next in thread: Saul Perlmutter: "Re: One additional request for a quick-and-dirty photo-z."
Maybe reply: Saul Perlmutter: "Re: One additional request for a quick-and-dirty photo-z."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Bahram,
Thanks again for you help with this run. It looks likely that we
will not follow any of the supernova, since aside from that z~1.45 one
there isn't much that looks good for very-high-redshift. However, for
completeness, we're still checking out a few more very faint
candidates. Would you mind checking the "quick and dirty" photo-z for
this candidate (likely the last we'll be asking about this run):

acs04b-002 12:37:08.74 / +62:20:47.53

Thank you! --Saul

Next message: Tony Spadafora: "Fwd from Bahram: Re: One additional request for a quick-and-dirty photo-z."
Previous message: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "the two we didn't get"
Next in thread: Saul Perlmutter: "Re: One additional request for a quick-and-dirty photo-z."
Maybe reply: Saul Perlmutter: "Re: One additional request for a quick-and-dirty photo-z."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 24 2004 - 12:17:13 PDT