Fwd from Bahram: Re: One additional request for a quick-and-dirty photo-z.

From: Tony Spadafora (ALSpadafora@lbl.gov)
Date: Mon May 24 2004 - 13:26:01 PDT

  • Next message: Saul Perlmutter: "Re: One additional request for a quick-and-dirty photo-z."

    Begin forwarded message:
    > Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 15:32:29 -0400 (EDT)
    > From: Bahram Mobasher <mobasher@stsci.edu>
    > To: Saul Perlmutter <saul@lbl.gov>
    > cc: hstsearch@lbl.gov, "Robert A. Knop" <robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu>,
    > Rachel A Gibbons <RAGibbons@lbl.gov>,
    > Bahram Mobasher <mobasher@stsci.edu>
    > Subject: Re: One additional request for a quick-and-dirty photo-z.
    > In-Reply-To: <40B24A09.1050400@lbl.gov>
    > Message-ID:
    > <Pine.GSO.4.44.0405241527280.10170-100000@andromeda.stsci.edu>
    > MIME-Version: 1.0
    > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
    > X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at donner.stsci.edu)
    >
    >
    > Hi Saul
    >
    > The closest object to the coordinate you provided is at
    >
    > z(phot) = 0.44
    > 95% conf. interval: 0.13 - 0.64
    > Sprctral type: Sc
    > this object is at Delta(ra) = 1.06812E-4 Delta(Dec) = 9.15527E-05 from
    > your specified coordinate.
    >
    > There is another object at
    > Delta(ra) = 7.01904E-4 Delta(Dec) = 6.75201E-04
    > this has:
    >
    > z(phot) = 1.70
    > 95% confidence interval: 1.35 - 2.06
    > Sp. type: starburst
    >
    > This second object is obviously furrther away from the host
    > galaxy coordinate you provided.
    >
    > Bahram
    >
    > ***********************************************************************
    > *****
    > * *
    > *
    > * Bahram Mobasher * Phone: (410) 338 4974
    > *
    > * Space Telescope Science Institute *
    > *
    > * 3700 San Martin Drive * fax: (410) 338 5090
    > *
    > * Baltimore MD 21218 *
    > *
    > * USA * email:
    > mobasher@stsci.edu *
    > * *
    > *
    > ***********************************************************************
    > *****
    >
    >
    > On Mon, 24 May 2004, Saul Perlmutter wrote:
    >
    >> Hi Bahram,
    >> Thanks again for you help with this run. It looks likely that we
    >> will not follow any of the supernova, since aside from that z~1.45 one
    >> there isn't much that looks good for very-high-redshift. However,
    >> for
    >> completeness, we're still checking out a few more very faint
    >> candidates. Would you mind checking the "quick and dirty" photo-z
    >> for
    >> this candidate (likely the last we'll be asking about this run):
    >>
    >> acs04b-002 12:37:08.74 / +62:20:47.53
    >>
    >> Thank you! --Saul
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 24 2004 - 13:26:42 PDT