From: Robert A. Knop Jr. (robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Mon May 24 2004 - 08:44:01 PDT
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 08:39:37AM -0700, Saul Perlmutter wrote:
> You typed "I think we should not show them our 0's and 1's; no point."
> I think you meant to say "I think we should not show them our 0's"
> (based on the rest of your message) -- is that right?
Oops. Sign error. I meant "not show them our 0's and -1's."
> I guess there is one reason to also throw in the 0's, which are also
> clearly labeled "probably junk": if by any chance we resuscitate one
> of them later today, and the other team had it on their list, they will
> say that they found things we didn't.
I wouldn't worry about that. There's no reason for *us* to lie about
that, and I don't think they'd really believe that. Plus, there is the
candidate numbering and timestamps in the database. If they won't
believe our word on *that*, then they shouldn't be using anything in any
paper we publish.
-Rob
-- --Prof. Robert Knop Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 24 2004 - 08:44:45 PDT