Re: we have a 5 == LENS QUESTION (fwd)

From: Saul Perlmutter (saul@lbl.gov)
Date: Mon May 24 2004 - 08:42:52 PDT

  • Next message: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "Re: The Plan for our Meeting with the Other Team"

    ...Hmm... that's very interesting Ariel.

    What do people think -- if the other group doesn't go for this, I assume
    that we would follow it anyway despite the likely lensing (or because of
    the likely lensing)?

    Ariel Goobar wrote:

    >---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 17:36:24 +0200 (CEST)
    >From: Ariel Goobar <ariel@physto.se>
    >To: Robert A. Knop Jr. <robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu>
    >Cc: hstsearch@physto.se
    >Subject: Re: we have a 5 == LENS QUESTION
    >
    >Hi,
    >based on the numbers below, the magnification should be
    >1.1, 1.4 and 3.5 for a foreground mass of 10**11,10**12
    >and 10**13 solar masses.
    >
    >Cheers,
    > Ariel
    >
    >
    >On Mon, 24 May 2004, Robert A. Knop Jr. wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    >>On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 05:24:27PM +0200, Ariel Goobar wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>>Hi Rob,
    >>>how many arcsecs is the foreground (w.r.t SN) and do we have a photo-z
    >>>for it?
    >>>
    >>>
    >>Here's the full data:
    >>
    >>SN 12:36:54.08 +62:08:22.8
    >>Host 12:36:54.08 +62:08:22.4 z~1.45
    >>Spiral 12:36:54.15 +62:08:21.8 z~0.57
    >>
    >>I'll send you a picture shortly.
    >>
    >>-Rob
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >
    >
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 24 2004 - 08:43:36 PDT