Re: we have a 5 == LENS QUESTION

From: Robert A. Knop Jr. (robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Mon May 24 2004 - 08:24:37 PDT

Next message: Ariel Goobar: "Re: we have a 5 == LENS QUESTION (fwd)"

Previous message: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "The Plan for our Meeting with the Other Team"
In reply to: Saul Perlmutter: "Re: we have a 5 == LENS QUESTION"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 08:21:49AM -0700, Saul Perlmutter wrote:
> ...It would be really surprising if Adam didn't go after this one, but
> at least that means that we won't be trying to find five more candidates
> (3 more for them and 2 more for us) all in the next two searches, with
> more of the fields "owned" by them.

How does priority work in July? Are we first, or is July already "who
has more orbits left"?

-Rob

-- 
--Prof. Robert Knop
  Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University
  robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu

Next message: Ariel Goobar: "Re: we have a 5 == LENS QUESTION (fwd)"
Previous message: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "The Plan for our Meeting with the Other Team"
In reply to: Saul Perlmutter: "Re: we have a 5 == LENS QUESTION"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 24 2004 - 08:25:22 PDT