From: Natalia Kuznetsova (NVKuznetsova@lbl.gov)
Date: Sun May 23 2004 - 00:20:53 PDT
That's exactly what I had in mind - thanks Rachel. I had moved it to
"junk" as in "priority 1 = probably junk", for the purposes of follow-up.
I saw this candidate on the April subtraction, and it was obviously a
previously found supernova. It's definitely a good idea to collect these
guys some place separate.
Natalia
______________________
Natalia Kuznetsova
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
1 Cyclotron Road, MS 50R5032
Berkeley, CA 94720-8164
Tel: (510) 486-4877
FAX: (510) 486-7115
______________________
On Sat, 22 May 2004, Rachel A. Gibbons wrote:
>
> Hi Tony,
>
> So much for 2-3 hours...
>
> This candidate was originally not saved as a refound candidate, hence
> the new number. I think Natalia is saying is saying she's noticed it's an
> old supernova and so for this search, the follow-up priority should be
> VERY low.
>
> For the purposes of showing Lou and Adam that we also refound this
> candidate (they will have too), I'll go ahead and move it up to "3".
>
> Rachel
>
>
> On Sat, 22 May 2004, Tony Spadafora wrote:
>
> > Hi Natalia et al,
> >
> > We may learn something from refinding the Apr candidates, so rather
> > than labelling acs04b-016 as prior = -1 ("probably junk") we
> > should collect these somewhere - maybe put it with -acs04-185 which
> > Rachel found?
> >
> > By the way, it would be interesting if someone could see if we refind
> > two April cands that were brighter than the above two:
> > acs04-176 (z Apr = 23.7) (photo-z = 1.51)
> > acs04-194 (z Apr = 24.4) (photo-z = 0.74
> >
> > -Tony
> >
> >
>
> --
> ------------------------------
> Dr. R. A. Gibbons
> Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
> 1 Cyclotron Rd MS 50R5032
> Berkeley, CA 94720-8160
> USA
> Tel 510.486.7416
> ------------------------------
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun May 23 2004 - 00:21:23 PDT