From: Robert A. Knop Jr. (robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Sat May 22 2004 - 19:38:46 PDT
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 06:28:59PM -0700, Tony Spadafora wrote:
> Hi Natalia et al,
>
> We may learn something from refinding the Apr candidates, so rather
> than labelling acs04b-016 as prior = -1 ("probably junk") we
> should collect these somewhere - maybe put it with -acs04-185 which
> Rachel found?
For candidates refound, yes, group them at the bottom as Rachel did.
For candidates that we know we won't follow but *might* be of some
interest, stick them in 1. Save 0 for "almost certainly junk" and -1
for "junk".
-Rob
-- --Prof. Robert Knop Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 22 2004 - 19:39:38 PDT