Re: on refinding Apr candidates

From: Rachel A. Gibbons (ragibbons@lbl.gov)
Date: Sat May 22 2004 - 19:45:12 PDT

  • Next message: Tony Spadafora: "Sat evening status LBL"

        agree.

    On Sat, 22 May 2004, Robert A. Knop Jr. wrote:

    > On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 06:28:59PM -0700, Tony Spadafora wrote:
    > > Hi Natalia et al,
    > >
    > > We may learn something from refinding the Apr candidates, so rather
    > > than labelling acs04b-016 as prior = -1 ("probably junk") we
    > > should collect these somewhere - maybe put it with -acs04-185 which
    > > Rachel found?
    >
    > For candidates refound, yes, group them at the bottom as Rachel did.
    >
    > For candidates that we know we won't follow but *might* be of some
    > interest, stick them in 1. Save 0 for "almost certainly junk" and -1
    > for "junk".
    >
    > -Rob
    >
    >

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat May 22 2004 - 19:45:50 PDT