Re: What do you think we should do about figuring out why they are getting a clean subtraction at 049, 188, ...

From: Robert A. Knop Jr. (robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Mon Apr 05 2004 - 16:01:05 PDT

  • Next message: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "Re: What do you think we should do about figuring out why they are getting a clean subtraction at 049, 188, ..."

    acs04-049 is a hole in the ref.

    We're looking at 188 right now.

    On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 03:47:43PM -0700, Saul Perlmutter wrote:
    > Rob, What do you think we should do about figuring out why they are
    > getting a clean subtraction at 049, 188 (and three out of four new
    > images for 002, besides the cosmic ray)? I guess the real question is
    > whether we trust our own subtraction enough to consider these (and the
    > others that they didn't list) still to be strong candidates. 

    -- 
--Prof. Robert Knop
  Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University
  robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 05 2004 - 16:01:31 PDT