Re: acs04-002 / acs04-191

From: Vitaliy Fadeyev (VAFadeyev@lbl.gov)
Date: Mon Apr 05 2004 - 15:30:58 PDT

Next message: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "Re: What do you think we should do about figuring out why they are getting a clean subtraction at 049, 188, ..."

Previous message: Saul Perlmutter: "[Fwd: SNe host candidates]"
In reply to: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "acs04-002 / acs04-191"
Next in thread: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "Re: Your Message Sent on Mon, 5 Apr 2004 14:46:09 -0500"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Yes, there was 1 cosmic ray in the individual images, but the other 3 were
giving a consistent magnitude. There was at least one such case for
Adams last year candidates, therefore such objects were kept. The ref
structure is ugly of course.

vitaliy

"Robert A. Knop Jr." wrote:

> (We have two names for this.)
>
> I've attached the search and subtraction images for this candidate. The
> hole in the ref is apparent using the subtraction, and is off to the
> side from the candidate that was identified.
>
> I think that the candidate that was identified was a residual cosmic ray
> on top of the galaxy that we failed to clean. I'm not sure why it ended
> up on our list of good candidates.
>
> -Rob
>

Next message: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "Re: What do you think we should do about figuring out why they are getting a clean subtraction at 049, 188, ..."
Previous message: Saul Perlmutter: "[Fwd: SNe host candidates]"
In reply to: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "acs04-002 / acs04-191"
Next in thread: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "Re: Your Message Sent on Mon, 5 Apr 2004 14:46:09 -0500"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 05 2004 - 15:31:20 PDT