Re: What do you think we should do about figuring out why they are getting a clean subtraction at 049, 188, ...

From: Robert A. Knop Jr. (robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Mon Apr 05 2004 - 16:07:52 PDT

  • Next message: Vitaliy Fadeyev: "I-band for Adams candidate"

    On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 06:01:05PM -0500, Robert A. Knop Jr. wrote:
    > On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 03:47:43PM -0700, Saul Perlmutter wrote:
    > > Rob, What do you think we should do about figuring out why they are
    > > getting a clean subtraction at 049, 188 (and three out of four new
    > > images for 002, besides the cosmic ray)? I guess the real question is
    > > whether we trust our own subtraction enough to consider these (and the
    > > others that they didn't list) still to be strong candidates.
    >
    > acs04-049 is a hole in the ref.
    >
    > We're looking at 188 right now.

    188 looks real, still, but the shape is a bit scary.

    There's a lot of ugly junk in the residuals nearby. This is closish
    (but night right at) the edge of the chip.

    Rachel and I are going through all of our candidates right now and
    trying to figure out what is going on.

    -Rob & Rachel 

    -- 
--Prof. Robert Knop
  Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University
  robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 05 2004 - 16:08:18 PDT