Re: NOTE -- wrong magnitudes on individual images

From: Vitaliy Fadeyev (VAFadeyev@lbl.gov)
Date: Mon Apr 05 2004 - 10:34:38 PDT

  • Next message: Alex Conley: "ajanta/topdog"

    Sorry for confusion. I meant only cases where there is 1 or more CR clearly
    present in individual images.

    vitaliy

    "Robert A. Knop Jr." wrote:

    > On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 10:02:48AM -0700, Vitaliy Fadeyev wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > > That's not so great. The individual magnitudes may have entered in
    > > my decision-making in some cases. Granted those cases were doubtful
    > > to start with.
    >
    > In any event, you should not have thrown out a candidate because all the
    > individual magnitudes were consistent with each other and different from
    > the subtraction magnitude. If you saw a case where that happens, and
    > the individual magnitudes were *dimmer*, it indicates that something is
    > wrong, not that it's a bad candidate. (That's how Rachel and I found
    > the bug in the first place.)
    >
    > The only thing about those magnitudes that should affect whether or not
    > a candidate is a good one is if the individual images are *consistent*
    > with each other. Which this bug does not affect, anyway.
    >
    > -Rob
    >
    > --
    > --Prof. Robert Knop
    > Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University
    > robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 05 2004 - 10:35:00 PDT