From: Robert A. Knop Jr. (robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Mon Apr 05 2004 - 10:29:11 PDT
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 10:02:48AM -0700, Vitaliy Fadeyev wrote:
>
>
> That's not so great. The individual magnitudes may have entered in
> my decision-making in some cases. Granted those cases were doubtful
> to start with.
In any event, you should not have thrown out a candidate because all the
individual magnitudes were consistent with each other and different from
the subtraction magnitude. If you saw a case where that happens, and
the individual magnitudes were *dimmer*, it indicates that something is
wrong, not that it's a bad candidate. (That's how Rachel and I found
the bug in the first place.)
The only thing about those magnitudes that should affect whether or not
a candidate is a good one is if the individual images are *consistent*
with each other. Which this bug does not affect, anyway.
-Rob
-- --Prof. Robert Knop Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 05 2004 - 10:29:33 PDT