From: Rachel G. (gibbo@panisse.lbl.gov)
Date: Tue Mar 30 2004 - 18:35:05 PST
Hi Gerson & Vitaliy,
According to the GOODS transient page these were rising
events (although, the figure they show give an opposite
picture). We should make sure the subtractions (Feb search)
show Sedna. This is a clear event with an IAU designation
(2003ba). Loki on the other hand, does not - if what the
figures shown on the web page is correct, there ain't much
there. Have you gone straight to where the events should be
to look for them?
Nevermind, I just looked, and Sedna *is* there, possibly
below the cuts. Rob will fiddle with that. This is why
we're testing. As for the second one you mention Loki.
I'll have a look at that one too.
Ciao,
Rachel
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Gerson Goldhaber wrote:
> Hi All,
> Vitaly noticed that 3 of the missing SNe were actually found.
> adam03-026 is RAVEN this is a hostless event
> -012 is Anguta hostless
> -027 is Qiqirn Not listed as found through my mistake
> All these co-ords agreed to a few seconds.
>
> This means we found 11 SNe and missed 6 SNe. We will have to figure out
> how to handle the hostless ones.
> We have only compared to INCREASIND SNe. Is it possible that LOKI and
> SEDNA ar actually decrasing???
> cheers Gerson & Vitaly
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Mar 30 2004 - 18:35:31 PST