Re: HST LRP assumptions about 9727 & 9728 execution in 2004

From: Robert A. Knop Jr. (robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Thu Dec 04 2003 - 16:53:53 PST

  • Next message: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "Re: HST LRP assumptions about 9727 & 9728 execution in 2004"

    On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 07:35:18PM -0500, adam riess wrote:
    > I think the plan they sent is doable
    > for the first activation
    >
    > your activation
    > would look like
    >
    > discovery Jan ~23
    > peak: grism, ACS, nicmos ~10 orbits Feb 2
    > +5 days: ACS nicmos again ~5 orbits Feb 12
    > +10 days ACS ~2 orbits Feb 22
    > +15 days ACS ~2 orbits March 3
    > +20 days " March 13

    OK, you may be right -- is this based on our RPS2? I need to check with
    Rachel to make sure this fits with the follow-up plan we ended up with.
    I belive that we were talking about three different NICMOS epochs in our
    final plan, but to be honest I don't remember it. Rachel's the expert
    on that.

    -Rob 

    -- 
--Prof. Robert Knop
  Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University
  robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 04 2003 - 16:54:06 PST