From: Robert A. Knop Jr. (robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Thu Dec 04 2003 - 16:55:57 PST
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 06:53:53PM -0600, Robert A. Knop Jr. wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 07:35:18PM -0500, adam riess wrote:
> > I think the plan they sent is doable
> > for the first activation
> >
> > your activation
> > would look like
> >
> > discovery Jan ~23
> > peak: grism, ACS, nicmos ~10 orbits Feb 2
> > +5 days: ACS nicmos again ~5 orbits Feb 12
> > +10 days ACS ~2 orbits Feb 22
> > +15 days ACS ~2 orbits March 3
> > +20 days " March 13
>
> OK, you may be right -- is this based on our RPS2? I need to check with
> Rachel to make sure this fits with the follow-up plan we ended up with.
> I belive that we were talking about three different NICMOS epochs in our
> final plan, but to be honest I don't remember it. Rachel's the expert
> on that.
Ah -- yeah, in our plan we were interleaving ACS and NICMOS orbits, to
better sample the lightcurve. We would have to move away from doing
that; I'd prefer not to if we could avoid it, but this may turn out to
be the best compromise given the constraints on the other end.
-Rob
-- --Prof. Robert Knop Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 04 2003 - 16:56:08 PST