From: Rachel G. (gibbo@panisse.lbl.gov)
Date: Thu Dec 04 2003 - 16:35:03 PST
Rob,
Good. I just finished telling Tony this very thing.
Rachel
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Robert A. Knop Jr. wrote:
> This is a message I just sent as it appears things are snowballing
> forward.
>
> ----- Forwarded message from "Robert A. Knop Jr." <robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu> -----
>
> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 18:25:45 -0600
> From: "Robert A. Knop Jr." <robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu>
> To: adam riess <ariess@stsci.edu>
> Cc: jordan@stsci.edu, williamj@stsci.edu, hstserch@lbl.gov
> Subject: Re: HST LRP assumptions about 9727 & 9728 execution in 2004
>
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 07:22:43PM -0500, adam riess wrote:
> > Ian,Bill,
> >
> > To know if this will work we
> > need to see/check the orients allowed
> > over this range. The issue would be the 4th epoch which may not be available
> > at 0,45,90,135,180,etc degrees orient with only +/-5 degree tolerance.
> >
> >
> > Also, are the visibilities okay?
>
> One other worry-- the Feb 23 to Mar 7 gap will be a serious problem for
> follow-up of supernovae discovered in a Jan 11 search. (I don't know
> what cadence of follow-up Adam has in his program, but it would
> interfere with the plans that we have in ours.) I would like us to
> explore the possibility of moving everything back so that the first
> activation was on March 11, and another activation was added at the same
> spacing after the last one. How would observability be for these fields
> into the beginning of Sepetember (which is where follow-up would extened
> if we don't start until March 11)?
>
> -Rob
>
> --
> --Prof. Robert Knop
> Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University
> robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
>
> --
> --Prof. Robert Knop
> Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University
> robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Dec 04 2003 - 16:35:15 PST