Edits for the paper

From: Saul Perlmutter (saul@LBL.gov)
Date: Fri Jul 11 2003 - 13:14:15 PDT

  • Next message: clidman: "Re: Third post-referee HST paper version available"

    Hi again, Rob, Well, it took a little longer to type these edits in --- partly
    because I was trying to come up with easy wording fixes for a few places (rather than
    just complain about bad wordings). Also, note that there are some comments on Figures
    and Tables.
        Now I'll turn my attention back to the binning/residual plot question. --Saul

    Saul Perlmutter wrote:

    > Hi Rob,
    >
    > Here are my edits (see attached PDF file) for the letter to the editor
    > with its response to the referee comments.
    >
    > I've also just finished re-reading 64 pages of the current draft, and I
    > think it looks really good -- I have only a rather small list of edits
    > for the paper to send you tomorrow ( I can't type them in right now
    > before going to sleep). I'll also try to describe the suggestions for
    > a few (easy) cosmetic edits for the figures.
    >
    > --Saul
    >
    > P.S. After I type in the edits tomorrow, I'll try to help work on the
    > binned and residual plots to see if I can help finish that up.
    >
    > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > Name: knopREFRESPONSE_20030710saul.pdf
    > knopREFRESPONSE_20030710saul.pdf Type: Acrobat (application/pdf)
    > Encoding: base64
    > Download Status: Not downloaded with message





    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 11 2003 - 13:12:45 PDT