From: Gabriele Garavini (garavini@in2p3.fr)
Date: Wed Mar 16 2005 - 10:16:40 PST
Dear Chris,
thank you for your comments. I've implemented them and created a new
draft (supernovae/~garavini/papers).
I've changed the first and last paragraph of the paper trying to make
them more readable.
If we all agree, I would ask Tony to send the paper to the
collaboration for a one week review.
Thank you.
All the best
Gabriele
On Mar 15, 2005, at 9:43 PM, Chris Lidman wrote:
> Hi Gabriele,
> Thanks for the new version.
>
> There was one point you have asked me to clarify. This I do below.
>
> There are some additional very minor points that I note here. None are
> very significant and I think that the paper can be sent to the rest of
> the collaboration to review.
>
> Minor points
> ============
>
> I mildly object to adding "observed with the ESO VLT" in the title and
> the abstract. It is unnecessary.
>
> Move "C. Lidman" to the second group of authors, i. e. the alphabetical
> listing.
>
> I still find the first paragraph awkward. The other paragraphs in the
> introduction are fine.
>
> Comment e to table 2 is too terse.
>
> p8. type Ia -> Type Ia
>
> p8. EW of "Fe II 4800" EWS (delete the last EWS)
>
> p10. Capitalize "we" in the first para.
>
> The last paragraph undersells your result somewhat.
>
> Cheers, Chris.
>
>
>
>
>>
>>> You should mention the results of Isobel's work in the 3rd paragraph.
>>> You should not plot the results on Fig 3., since her paper has not
>>> yet been accepted.
>>>
>>
>> ------------- Sorry I do not understand what you mean here. I refer to
>> Isobel paper already in the introduction, but I could do it again in
>> this section. Could you suggest me the sentence you have in mind?
>> Thanks.
>> Also, what is that I should not plot in Fig 3. Note I'm not using any
>> of her data. --------
>>
>
> Isobel created a plot (Fig. 18 in her paper) that is very similar to
> the
> one in Fig. 3, and she concludes that there the CaII velocities of
> high-z SNe are consistent with those measured for low-z SNe. I think
> that you should mention this in the last paragraph of section 3.1.
>
> After the second sentence, you could add the following
>
> "A similar result was obtained by Hook et al. (2005)."
>
> In regards to using her data in figure 3, I understand that you have
> not
> used her data. Currently, I think that that is the correct thing to do.
>
>
> --
> European Southern Observatory
> Alonso de Córdova 3107, Vitacura
> Casilla 19001, Santiago 19
> CHILE
>
> Ph. +56 2 463 3106
> FAX +56 2 463 3001
>
>
>
========================================================
LPNHE - IN2P3 - CNRS University of Paris VI and Paris VII
4 place Jussieu, Tour 33 - Rez de chaussee 75252 Paris Cedex 05 France
Phone: +33 1 44 27 41 54, e-mail: garavini@in2p3.fr
ICQ: 148161845, AIM: gabrigaravini
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Mar 16 2005 - 10:16:51 PST