Re: HST paper comments

From: Gerson Goldhaber (g_goldhaber@lbl.gov)
Date: Fri May 02 2003 - 11:36:44 PDT

  • Next message: Lifan Wang: "Spec fit"

    Hi Rob,
       Don't worry. We have 11 new SNe vs their 8. Anyhow great paper!

    Comments:

    p4 left hand side,end and beginning of paragraph
    ...reported in this paper are AT spaced... leave out AT
    Spectra are obtained AT with ... leave out
    AT
    Sne Ib/c change to SNe Ib/c

    p7 right hand side below middle
    The first 90 days... should read ; The
    first 100 days ...

    Table 4 last line
    199fG is presumably 1994G should go to line 3

    re Table 4, I think we should comment that most of the s values are
    within 0.1 of the s values with the old B-template (SCP1997) of
    Goldhaber 2001. One major exception 1992bi which has gone from 1.55 to
    0.86 a different minimum. Two other SNe 1994al and 1996cl differ
    (old-new) by -0.175 and 0.167
     respectively.
    This could be a Table 4 footnote

    p13 right hand side near end of paragraph
    ...and > 3 - \sigma above ... should read ...and >
    3\sigma above ... presumably

    p17 left hand side near middle
    ...between the reddening HIGH AND REDSHIFT SUPERNOVAE ...
    please clarify

    place Fig 4 before Fig 5.

    p22 right hand side near middle
    Figure 5 should be Figure 7 ??

    p25 left hand side near end of paragraph
    methodologiCes sp
    also near bottom
    ...the minimum chisq value .... is 0.28 magnitudes lower ...
    should not say magnitudes
    Fig 5 should be Fig 8 also on P26 check Figure
    numbers on these pages

    p26 left near bottom
    ... from a significant ABOUT of host-galaxy ... should
    be BOUT ??

    p27 right near bottom
    UNappropriately should be
    INappropriately

    p28 left middle
    Gravitation lensing ... should be
    GravitationAL lensing ...
    a few lines further
    ... compact objects OF the total ... should be ...
    compact objects IN the total ...

    p28 right middle
    ...additional work AS been done ... should be
    ...additional work HAS been done ...

    p29 right 1/3 down
    ... on nearby SNe Ia OF strongly limit ... should be ...on
    nearby SN Ia strongly limit...
    1/3 from bottom
    ....this smaller than .. should
    be ...this IS smaller than...

    p32 left near bottom
    w = -1.15
    +/-
    incorrect +/- type

                                  this is all I could find cheers Gerson



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri May 02 2003 - 11:37:05 PDT