From: Gerson Goldhaber (g_goldhaber@lbl.gov)
Date: Thu Mar 13 2003 - 18:00:12 PST
Hi Rob,
Here is the result of the comparison. i refers to Rob's new fits
j refers
to our old fits in P99
name1(j),SNname(i),lblname(j),mb(i),mbb(j),mb(i)-mbb(j),stret(i),s(j),stret(i)-s(j)
92bi 921 921 22.80 22.81 -0.01 0.86 1.55 -0.69
95aw 9568 9568 22.28 22.27 0.01 1.19 1.16 0.03
95as 9569 9569 23.68 23.66 0.02 1.04 1.09 -0.05
95aq 9570 9570 23.25 23.24 0.01 0.87 0.87 -0.00
95ar 9579 9579 23.49 23.35 0.14 0.92 0.97 -0.05
96cf 962 962 23.30 23.25 0.05 1.00 1.03 -0.03
96cg 963 963 23.09 23.06 0.03 1.01 1.06 -0.05
96ci 969 969 22.82 22.82 0.00 0.97 1.02 -0.06
96ck 9617 9617 23.76 23.62 0.14 0.89 0.91 -0.03
96cl 9621 9621 24.53 24.58 -0.05 0.99 1.13 -0.14
96cm 9624 9624 23.26 23.22 0.04 0.90 0.92 -0.02
96cn 9626 9626 23.25 23.19 0.06 0.89 0.89 -0.00
97I 970 970 20.41 20.20 0.21 0.96 0.94 0.02
97H 971 971 23.25 23.21 0.04 0.89 0.90 -0.02
97G 972 972 24.41 24.49 -0.08 0.82 0.97 -0.15
97F 974 974 23.49 23.45 0.04 1.05 1.02 0.02
97J 975 975 23.84 23.80 0.04 1.04 1.00 0.03
97L 976 976 23.49 23.53 -0.04 0.94 0.98 -0.04
97N 9710 9710 20.49 20.42 0.07 1.07 1.03 0.04
97O 9733 9733 23.51 23.51 0.00 1.04 1.02 0.02
97P 9738 9738 23.15 23.14 0.01 0.89 0.95 -0.06
97S 9739 9739 23.77 23.59 0.18 1.21 1.18 0.03
97Q 9742 9742 22.61 22.60 0.01 0.94 0.95 -0.02
97K 9748 9748 24.42 24.33 0.09 1.08 1.18 -0.09
97R 9760 9760 23.88 23.83 0.05 0.98 0.99 -0.01
97ac 9765 9765 21.90 21.83 0.07 1.06 1.05 0.00
97ai 9779 9779 22.94 22.81 0.13 0.77 1.04 -0.28
97af 9781 9781 23.59 23.54 0.05 0.86 0.88 -0.03
97ap 9784 9784 24.35 24.30 0.05 1.00 1.03 -0.03
97am 9785 9785 22.58 22.52 0.06 1.03 1.10 -0.07
97aj 9794 9794 23.50 23.12 0.38 1.50 0.94 0.56
There are only 2 serious discrepancies: 92bi (921) and 97aj (9794) ,the
ones we picked out in our discussion to-day! Also 97I (970) is off by
0.21 in mb.
cheers Gerson
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 13 2003 - 18:00:30 PST