Re: comparison of mb and stretch, old and new extended

From: Gerson Goldhaber (g_goldhaber@lbl.gov)
Date: Mon Mar 17 2003 - 10:10:52 PST

  • Next message: Gerson Goldhaber: "Re: comparison of mb and stretch, old and new, now for Hamuy data"

    I have introduced a combined mb as well as stretch error:
    error_mb=sqrt(dmb(i)^2+dmbb(j)^2)
    error_s=sqrt(dstret(i)^2+ds(j)^2)
    Remember i stands for Rob's NEW results, j stands for P99 results

        1 2 2 4 5
    6 7 8 9
    10 11
    name1(j),SNname(i),zzz(j),mb(i),mbb(j),mb(i)-mbb(j),error_mb,(mb(i)-mbb(j))/error_mb,stret(i),s(j),stret(i)-s(j),error_s,(stret(i)-s(j))/error_s,

       1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
    9 10 11 12 13
     92bi 921 0.46 22.80 22.81 -0.01 0.13 -0.07 0.86 1.55 -0.69 0.51
    -1.36
     95aw 9568 0.40 22.28 22.27 0.01 0.04 0.24 1.19 1.16 0.03 0.05
    0.51
     95as 9569 0.50 23.68 23.66 0.02 0.10 0.20 1.04 1.09 -0.05 0.14
    -0.38
     95aq 9570 0.45 23.25 23.24 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.87 0.87 -0.00 0.14
    -0.01
     95ar 9579 0.47 23.49 23.35 0.14 0.09 1.57 0.92 0.97 -0.05 0.18
    -0.29
     96cf 962 0.57 23.30 23.25 0.05 0.04 1.18 1.00 1.03 -0.03 0.09
    -0.30
     96cg 963 0.49 23.09 23.06 0.03 0.04 0.71 1.01 1.06 -0.05 0.06
    -0.73
     96ci 969 0.50 22.82 22.82 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.97 1.02 -0.06 0.07
    -0.86
     96ck 9617 0.66 23.76 23.62 0.14 0.09 1.63 0.89 0.91 -0.03 0.14
    -0.18
     96cl 9621 0.83 24.53 24.58 -0.05 0.19 -0.26 0.99 1.13 -0.14 0.37
    -0.38
     96cm 9624 0.45 23.26 23.22 0.04 0.10 0.40 0.90 0.92 -0.02 0.09
    -0.23
     96cn 9626 0.43 23.25 23.19 0.06 0.04 1.41 0.89 0.89 -0.00 0.09
    -0.03
      97I 970 0.17 20.41 20.20 0.21 0.02 9.39 0.96 0.94 0.02 0.03
    0.64
      97H 971 0.53 23.25 23.21 0.04 0.06 0.69 0.89 0.90 -0.02 0.07
    -0.25
      97G 972 0.76 24.41 24.49 -0.08 0.57 -0.14 0.82 0.97 -0.15 0.20
    -0.75
      97F 974 0.58 23.49 23.45 0.04 0.08 0.47 1.05 1.02 0.02 0.10
    0.26
      97J 975 0.62 23.84 23.80 0.04 0.10 0.40 1.04 1.00 0.03 0.18
    0.18
      97L 976 0.55 23.49 23.53 -0.04 0.07 -0.57 0.94 0.98 -0.04 0.11
    -0.35
      97N 9710 0.18 20.49 20.42 0.07 0.02 3.13 1.07 1.03 0.04 0.03
    1.68
      97O 9733 0.37 23.51 23.51 0.00 0.10 0.00 1.04 1.02 0.02 0.10
    0.19
      97P 9738 0.47 23.15 23.14 0.01 0.06 0.18 0.89 0.95 -0.06 0.06
    -1.11
      97S 9739 0.61 23.77 23.59 0.18 0.06 2.81 1.21 1.18 0.03 0.09
    0.35
      97Q 9742 0.43 22.61 22.60 0.01 0.04 0.28 0.94 0.95 -0.02 0.04
    -0.49
      97K 9748 0.59 24.42 24.33 0.09 0.16 0.58 1.08 1.18 -0.09 0.23
    -0.40
      97R 9760 0.66 23.88 23.83 0.05 0.07 0.71 0.98 0.99 -0.01 0.10
    -0.14
     97ac 9765 0.32 21.90 21.83 0.07 0.03 2.21 1.06 1.05 0.00 0.02
    0.14
     97ai 9779 0.45 22.94 22.81 0.13 0.07 1.84 0.77 1.04 -0.28 0.17
    -1.67
     97af 9781 0.58 23.59 23.54 0.05 0.11 0.47 0.86 0.88 -0.03 0.07
    -0.36
     97ap 9784 0.83 24.35 24.30 0.05 0.10 0.51 1.00 1.03 -0.03 0.08
    -0.44
     97am 9785 0.42 22.58 22.52 0.06 0.08 0.79 1.03 1.10 -0.07 0.08
    -0.86
     97aj 9794 0.58 23.50 23.12 0.38 0.07 5.27 1.50 0.94 0.56 0.09
    5.94

    we have to try to understand column 8, where some of the values are
    uncomfortably large and column 13 to some extend as well.

    Gerson

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Mar 17 2003 - 10:11:09 PST