From: Alex Conley (aconley@panisse.lbl.gov)
Date: Wed Nov 06 2002 - 13:50:38 PST
We got some more data last night for fields SXDS_1 and SXDS_5. I have
used the new data to go back and look once again for the candidates
that Naoki reported in SXDS_5 that we didn't see. If you recall,
there were two I said were in local bad areas for us, and one that
was completely absent. Careful combinations of the news have
allowed us to get a better look at these two, and they have now been
saved to sntrak. The one that we didn't see is still not there,
and the subtraction is still very clear.
So -- summarizing for SXDS_5:
Berkeley name RA(2000) DEC(2000) Note
SuF02-025 2:16:23.93 -4:49:29.4
SuF02-085 2:16:03.4 -4:55:13.9 Right on center, 3%
increase, ap sig 2.8.
weak candidate
2:15:47.23 -4:56:43.3 Nothing there. Very clean
subtraction.
SuF02-090 2:15:41.76 -4:54:14.6 9% increase, ap sig 4.5
SuF02-027 2:17:00.07 -4:58:19.9
SuF02-071 2:17:08.66 -5:02:06.7
SuF02-028 2:16:56.38 -5:00:57.7
SuF02-017 2:16:45.71 -5:09:51.2
Alex
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Nov 06 2002 - 13:50:55 PST