Re: S02-064

From: Robert A. Knop Jr. (robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Wed May 15 2002 - 11:49:28 PDT

Next message: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "Status of T02-030, T02-028, and T02-047"

Previous message: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "Re: Period 70."
In reply to: DAHowell@lbl.gov: "Re: S02-064"
Next in thread: Lifan Wang: "Re: S02-064"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> Actually, I would guess that S02-064 is past maximum. It may even be a
> Ib/c -- it looks a lot like SN 1994 I at +11d at z=0.33. I interpret
> the comments in SN Trak to mean that there is light in the reference,
> so that is a possibility. I have added many postmax templates to my
> program to check this and it is running now.

I'm still fighting with some not-great subtractions (and possible wrong
filters in two cases), and making sure the images don't have cosmic
rays, but the TNG data suggests that S02-064 is indeed after maximum--
or at least on the way down as of may 13.

-Rob

Next message: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "Status of T02-030, T02-028, and T02-047"
Previous message: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "Re: Period 70."
In reply to: DAHowell@lbl.gov: "Re: S02-064"
Next in thread: Lifan Wang: "Re: S02-064"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed May 15 2002 - 11:49:50 PDT