From: DAHowell@lbl.gov
Date: Mon May 13 2002 - 00:20:59 PDT
Actually, I would guess that S02-064 is past maximum. It may even be a
Ib/c -- it looks a lot like SN 1994 I at +11d at z=0.33. I interpret
the comments in SN Trak to mean that there is light in the reference,
so that is a possibility. I have added many postmax templates to my
program to check this and it is running now.
I agree with Isobel that T02-037 is a Ia at z=0.49. My program gives a
best fit to SN 1990N at -7d at that redshift.
C02-027 doesn't look like much of anything. I don't see any obvious SN
signal in the infamous LINER spectrum of C02-031 either.
-Andy
----- Original Message -----
From: Isobel Hook <ihook@gemini.edu>
Date: Sunday, May 12, 2002 4:18 am
Subject: S02-064
>
> Hi,
> I've looked at the Gemini data on S02-064 again too. See
> http://ftp.gemini.edu/staff/ihook/SN/
> S02_064.*
>
> The best match (by eye) that I could get from the templates I have
> is 90N
> at -14 days. Perhaps someone else could have a look at this since
> we may
> have caught it nice and early.
>
> Isobel.
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 13 2002 - 00:21:14 PDT