From: Isobel Hook (ihook@gemini.edu)
Date: Mon May 13 2002 - 00:41:18 PDT
Hi,
As another opinion, I dont know if you've seen Lifan's fits for this one?
He has put them on http://panisse.lbl.gov/~lifan/HiZ/May/
From that it looks like he gets a best match of 90N at -7 days, z=0.56.
Isobel.
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Ariel Goobar wrote:
>
> Dear Chris et al,
> reading Andy's mail it sounds like T02-037 is the better choice for
> ISAAC follow-up. With a rest-frame epoch of -7 it should be about
> 22.85 in J and become almost ~0.2 mag brighter within the coming week.
> Rob: can the dating be confirmed with the TNG data points?
> Ariel
>
>
> On Mon, 13 May 2002 DAHowell@lbl.gov wrote:
>
> > Actually, I would guess that S02-064 is past maximum. It may even be a
> > Ib/c -- it looks a lot like SN 1994 I at +11d at z=0.33. I interpret
> > the comments in SN Trak to mean that there is light in the reference,
> > so that is a possibility. I have added many postmax templates to my
> > program to check this and it is running now.
> >
> > I agree with Isobel that T02-037 is a Ia at z=0.49. My program gives a
> > best fit to SN 1990N at -7d at that redshift.
> >
> > C02-027 doesn't look like much of anything. I don't see any obvious SN
> > signal in the infamous LINER spectrum of C02-031 either.
> >
> > -Andy
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Isobel Hook <ihook@gemini.edu>
> > Date: Sunday, May 12, 2002 4:18 am
> > Subject: S02-064
> >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > I've looked at the Gemini data on S02-064 again too. See
> > > http://ftp.gemini.edu/staff/ihook/SN/
> > > S02_064.*
> > >
> > > The best match (by eye) that I could get from the templates I have
> > > is 90N
> > > at -14 days. Perhaps someone else could have a look at this since
> > > we may
> > > have caught it nice and early.
> > >
> > > Isobel.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> --
> ___________________________________________________________________
> Ariel Goobar (ariel@physto.se)
> FYSIKUM, Stockholm University
> Stockholm Center for Physics, Astronomy & Biotechnology
> tel: +46 8 55378659
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 13 2002 - 00:41:41 PDT