From: Saul Perlmutter (saul@lbl.gov)
Date: Fri May 10 2002 - 21:22:33 PDT
I'm beginning to like C02-031 too. I think it's up there on our priority
list (unless anyone sees anything wrong with it) -- and it could use a
finding chart very soon, if we want to try to get it to one of the telescopes
(like GMOS) quickly. Alex, are you still up and making finding charts?
(The only thing that I know of that could change our confidence in it right
now is if it is shown not to exist on any of the dithers of the CFHT images
where it would have been expected to be seen.)
"Robert A. Knop Jr." wrote:
> > As of now, only T02-015 looks like an HST candidate (i.e. I_cousins
> > ~ 24th mag) that we all feel pretty sure about. If anybody else has a
> > strong suggestion for other favorite HST candidates, let us know, and
> > once we have a quick consensus we'll add it to Chris' VLT/FORS1 request
> > list.
>
> C02-031 ; T02-015 is probably better, but be sure to think about C02-031
> (which wasn't thought about yesterday).
>
> -Rob
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri May 10 2002 - 21:19:17 PDT