Re: Satie

From: Isobel Hook (ihook@gemini.edu)
Date: Sun Apr 21 2002 - 02:08:00 PDT

  • Next message: clidman: "Re: Satie"

    Hi all,

    OK well it sounds as though it may not be worth going for a host for
    Satie this NIRI run. If it turns out we dont get to use all our NIRI time
    this run then doing Satie in June is still a possibility (There is no NIRI
    time available in May).

    I quite agree with Chris that these observations can take a long time and
    we dont have much of a window. We are hoping to use essentially the whole
    of the upcoming NIRI run (4 nights) so if everything goes perfectly we'll
    get two targets. However banking on a NIRI run going perfectly is probably
    not all that sensible at this stage so maybe we should start one SN with
    ISAAC now.

    However I am confused about when ISAAC is availble.
    Chris wrote:

    > Because of this problem, ISAAC has been rescheduled to service until
    >the 18th.
    >The 19th is scheduled as technical and may become service. So there is a
    >small window
    >of opportunity to do one candidate now. Service observing restarts on the
    >23rd.

    So What is happening now (19-22nd)? Is that time available? Also is
    "service" time the same as queue, i.e. available to us or not? (Is Tony's
    plan on the web correct now? It shows VLTI commissioning 23,24,25).

    The disadvantage of using ISAAC now is that this would mean we have less
    ISAAC time next month, when we dont have NIRI time either. Obviously this
    needs to be decided pretty soon. How is this going to be finialised?

    Isobel.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 21 2002 - 02:12:02 PDT