From: Chris Lidman (clidman@eso.org)
Date: Mon Apr 26 2004 - 12:40:53 PDT
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the comment. I agree that some of these
(S10-037, C02-030, SuF02-051) could be type IIs and I have
commented on this possibility in the comments to each candidate.
However, I'll leave the classification as ?, rather than II?, because
I feel less certain with these than with C02-031, which we have
classified as II?
I'll have a new version of the paper ready by the end of the week.
Cheers, Chris.
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 12:22, Peter Nugent wrote:
> > I'd like to remind you that the current version of this paper is
> > still available for review. I have not received too many comments, so I
> > presume that most of you are happy with it. If there are no further
> > comments, then perhaps we can submit this paper in the near future.
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> I like what I see. My one, and only comment, is that I think that a couple
> of the blue, featureless spectra could be classified as Type II(?) as this
> is a characteristic of early Type II's. Though I would limit this only to
> the low-redshift ones (e.g. S01-037), and I'd definitely have a question
> mark.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Peter
>
> __
> Peter E. Nugent
> Staff Computational Scientist - Scientific Computing Group - NERSC
> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
> M.S. 50F-1650 - 1 Cyclotron Road - Berkeley, CA, 94720-8139
> Phone:(510) 486-6942 - Fax:(510) 486-5812
> E-mail: penugent@LBL.gov - Web: http://supernova.LBL.gov/~nugent
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 26 2004 - 12:41:23 PDT