From: Chris Lidman (clidman@eso.org)
Date: Sun Apr 18 2004 - 14:55:31 PDT
Dear All,
I'd like to remind you that the current version of this paper is
still available for review. I have not received too many comments, so I
presume that most of you are happy with it. If there are no further
comments, then perhaps we can submit this paper in the near future.
Regards,
Chris.
On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 19:48, Chris Lidman wrote:
> Dear All,
> I have made available the new version of the VLT spectroscopic paper
> (v1.2) at http://www.sc.eso.org/~clidman/
>
> I'd like to thank everyone for the comments I have received thus
> far. They have certainly improved the paper.
>
> I've deliberately put your name on this e-mail list because I'd like
> you to give the paper a careful read. In particular, I'd like you to
> concentrate on the following points (most of the points are minor)
>
> 1) The description of the searches in the paper should be carefully
> checked by those who were leading the searches. My idea is not to give
> a detailed description of the search techniques, but to give enough of
> an overview so that rest of the paper is placed into context.
>
> 2) T02-047 - Rob, I've included a discussion you and I had on this
> candidate as a private communication. Do you agree?
>
> 3) SN 2001gs and SN 2002fp - These were not securely
> classified as SN~Ia from the VLT spectra; however, they have
> IAU names.
>
> At one stage SN 2001gs/S01-028/Chopin was considered a possible SN~Ia,
> but Andy and I have relegated this one into the unclassified bin. Did we
> follow this one later?
>
> 2002fp/C02-030/Troudux was never considered a possible SN~Ia. Was
> this followed in the rolling search at CFHT?
>
> Cheers, Chris.
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 18 2004 - 14:58:30 PDT