Re: PDF markup of July 21st draft

From: Serena Nobili (serena@lpnhep.in2p3.fr)
Date: Wed Oct 27 2004 - 07:43:11 PDT

  • Next message: Rahman Amanullah: "Re: SN 1999Q"

    Hi Greg,

    I am sorry for the delay in answering your email.
    I have already addressed all your comments in the most recent version of
    the paper, apart from the ones on SN99Q, that as you know, keeps
    changing. I copy here part of your comments or questions that need a
    direct answer.
    Cheers

          Serena

    G: Greg
    S: Serena

    G: You used the Lira method on the Riess'Sne?
    S: Actually, Phillips et al. (1999) did it. I have used the same method
    on the Jha data.

    G: In Fig3 two Sne are as or more deviant than 98es and 99dq.
    S: Yes, it is true. But the problem with 98es and 99dq is that they become
    redder after extinction correction than before correction.

    G. In Fig4 the deviant supernovae lack a second peak.
    S: Although they show a less prominent second peak, there are others with
    the same lightcurve shape (e.g. 92bc) but that are in the ballpark. Thus,
    we cannot claim they are deviant because of this lightcurve property.

    G: Caption of Table 4. Circle around the +- sign. "Double valued? Pick the
    right one"
    S: I don't understand your comment. The note to the table refers to the
    last column in which you have a value +- its uncertainty, and the note
    explain how the value and the uncertainty are computed.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    http://supernovae.in2p3.fr/~serena/
    www.physto.se/~serena
    Tel +33 1 44277329

                                                                                    
    Give free food at:
    http://www.porloschicos.com/
    http://www.thehungersite.com/
                                                                                    

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 27 2004 - 07:43:21 PDT