From: Serena Nobili (serena@physto.se)
Date: Fri Jan 16 2004 - 09:09:23 PST
Dear Vitaliy,
I am sorry I forgot to mention these two points.
For the first one, i.e. the fit of the rise curve, I hope I will have time
to try something once the writing for the thesis is over. For the second
point, i.e. the correlation between the parameters fitted, I know the
procedure I am using can compute them, unfortunately I don't have them
saved anywhere. I will run the whole fitting procedure once more and save
this information.
Thanks
Serena
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 VAFadeyev@lbl.gov wrote:
>
>
>Dear Serena,
>
>there is one other thing discussed at the meeting,
>which is not on your list. If I remember correctly,
>the idea was to try another template to fit the rise
>curve better. The potential implications include
>the maximum magnitude adjustment and the time
>of the maximium shifts. If you can show that
>difference is "small", then it would be a good
>thing to state, to safeguard against potential
>criticism.
>
>I would also be happy to see the degree of fit parameter correlations,
>either from the parameter covariance matrix (if your procedure can show
>that), or from Monte Carlo. The correlations you see are a very strong
>result of your paper, and it would be good to check that the fitting
>procedure does not cause them in a substantial way.
>
>Cheers,
>vitaliy
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------ www.physto.se/~serena Tel +46 8 55378661
Give free food at: http://www.porloschicos.com/ http://www.thehungersite.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jan 16 2004 - 09:09:29 PST