From: Greg Aldering (aldering@panisse.lbl.gov)
Date: Thu Jan 08 2004 - 14:05:51 PST
Hi Serena,
Attached are my scanned comments on the I-band paper, which the rest of my
current suggestions. I didn't make an MP3 narrative as Saul did, but I
hope this is useful in any case.
I am still digesting your replys to the issues in my previous email. One
thing though is that you have confirmed that the CT data are offset from
the good CfA2 data. Lifan mentioned his concern that this might be a
K-correction problem; whatever the reason we should try to understand
that. Also, now having seen the RMS for the CT, CfA, and CfA2 datasets, it
is clear that CfA (Riess) should be given lower weight (i.e. based on the
relative dispersions).
Cheers,
Greg
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 08 2004 - 14:06:03 PST