From: Vallery Stanishev (vall@physto.se)
Date: Fri Dec 03 2004 - 10:46:20 PST
I agree that it is not very convincing, but this is the best match....
Vallery
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Robert A. Knop Jr. wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 07:31:31PM +0100, Vallery Stanishev wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > This is also consistent with the SN spectrum, which suggest z~1.72.
>
> What is that based on? I remember the two humps you had when you first
> showed it to us:
>
> http://brahms.phy.vanderbilt.edu/~rknop/cgi-bin/scp-twiki/view/ACS2004/MingusSpectrumPlotsAndMusings
>
> that led us to think maybe 1.72.
>
> However spectrum you have in the slides on:
>
> http://supernova.lbl.gov:8080/twiki/bin/view/Main/NovTeleconference
>
> looks quite different, and doesn't show a convincing match to z=1.72 at
> all.
>
> -Rob
>
>
-- ******************************************************** Dr. Vallery Stanishev Stockholm University AlbaNova University Center FYSIKUM 106 91 Stockholm SWEDENtel: +46 8 55378731 fax: +46 8 55378601 vall@physto.se vall_1@yahoo.com ********************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 03 2004 - 10:47:06 PST