Re: Mobasher's photo-z's

From: Saul Perlmutter (saul@lbl.gov)
Date: Sun May 23 2004 - 20:25:15 PDT

  • Next message: Robert A. Knop Jr.: "Re: Mobasher's photo-z's"

    Hmm... As we suspected from the magnitudes, this looks like a rather
    low-redshift bunch! I'm disappointed that -011 didn't turn out to be
    higher redshift (at least z ~ 1.2), although I guess the photo-z is
    uncertain enough that it's just possible that it is.

    And it looks like we only have two more tiles left to search. If this
    is all we have, then perhaps we should at least request the photo-z's
    for a couple of the unlikely ones, like -002, just for completeness.
    That way, if we by any chance resuscitate them, we won't have to ask
    Bahram for photo-z's in a big rush. Any other examples in this
    category? (No rush, since we probably want to wait for the last few
    tiles to be completed first, in any case.)

       

    Robert A. Knop Jr. wrote:

    >Attached are the photo-z's that Bahram sent us.
    >
    >-Rob
    >
    >
    >
    >------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > phot-z 95% confidence Spectral type
    > interval
    >
    >acs04b-011 12:37:33.85 +62:19:22.3 0.88 0.63 - 1.39 Sc
    >gal1 12:37:33.86 +62:19:23.0 0.87 0.62 - 1.48 Sc
    >
    >acs04b-001 12:36:26.67 +62:08:30.1 0.55 0.35 - 0.75 Sc
    >
    >acs04b-005 12:36:34.85 +62:15:49.2 0.85 0.61 - 1.09 Sb
    >gal1 12:36:35.30 +62:15:47.8 0.25 0.09 - 0.41 Sc
    >
    >acs04b-006 12:36:58.45 +62:16:37.4 0.57 0.36 - 0.78 Sc
    >gal1 12:36:58.82 +62:16:38.1 0.42 0.23 - 0.61 Sc
    >gal2 12:36:58.09 +62:16:39.4 0.86 0.62 - 1.1 E
    >
    >acs04b-007 12:35:50.78 +62:10:38.2 0.56 0.36 - 0.76 Sc
    >gal1 the same as above
    >gal2 12:35:51.3 +62:10:40.2 0.87 0.62 - 1.12 Sc
    >
    >acs04b-018 12:37:22.34 +62:13:53.2 0.84 0.60 - 1.08 Sc
    >gal1 12:37:22.34 +62:13:50.5 0.97 0.71 - 1.23 Irr
    >gal2 12:37:22.57 +62:13:57.0 0.87 0.62 - 1.12 Sc
    >
    >acs04b-023 12:36:34.35 +62:12:13.12 0.47 0.28 - 0.66 E
    >
    >acs04b-025 12:37:48.40 +62:13:35.3 0.89 0.64 - 1.14 Sa/Sb
    >
    >acs04b-026 12:37:49.58 +62:13:46.6 could this be a galaxy at very high-z?
    > this seems to me to be a drop-out
    > (z~5 ?) haven't checked the image.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun May 23 2004 - 20:25:56 PDT