From: VAFadeyev@lbl.gov
Date: Wed Apr 28 2004 - 14:17:38 PDT
From my memory, at some point during the discussions
that night/morning Adam showed a presentation slide
with a bunch of patches with his redshift 1.5 SN.
He was saying that the object was fading extremely
fast in Z band, which is why they switched to NICMOS
in the middle of the followup. This fast fading
seemed to perturb him, they did not quite expect
that. Later on Adam asked to supply him with our
followup expirience relatively fast. His motivation
was that there are "not that many" objects at this
redshift. This meant to be informal and very
preliminary. In fact, I took it to be postage stamp
images sharing again.
vitaliy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert A. Knop Jr." <robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu>
Date: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 1:33 pm
Subject: Message from Adam
> I got this from Adam.
>
> What actually was the nature of the agreement that was made re:
> tellingAdam about our Followup and sending him stuff?
>
> -Rob
>
> ----- Forwarded message from adam riess <ariess@stsci.edu> -----
>
> Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 13:46:36 -0400 (EDT)
> From: adam riess <ariess@stsci.edu>
> Subject: Re: April IAUC as sent to Dan Green.
> To: ragibbons@lbl.gov
> Cc: robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu
>
> Rachel, Rob
>
> I had asked you guys to share with us how your follow-up
> looked of your HST object to add to our database of experience
> on effective follow-up and you guys
> had agreed. So, how does the grism and images look?
> Can we see some jpeg postage stamps? How is
> the S/N? Before or after max? Can you tell if it is a Ia?
> And how is the NICMOS data?
>
> -Adam
>
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
>
> --
> --Prof. Robert Knop
> Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University
> robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Apr 28 2004 - 14:17:57 PDT