From: Saul Perlmutter (saul@lbl.gov)
Date: Mon Apr 05 2004 - 21:00:51 PDT
Robert A. Knop Jr. wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 11:10:09PM -0400, Adam G. Riess wrote:
>
>
>>Okay, last chance, if someone wants to talk
>>~now give me a phone number where to call you,
>>otherwise I will sign off until tomorrow.
>>
>>I will say I have been reviewing some of the objects which you
>>guys listed and we did not and I haven't seen anything
>>in our data which is convincing.
>>
>>e.g., acs04-141 this is right on the edge of the gap
>>and it is missing in the first dither...in that position
>>I do not trust the geometric distortion
>>
>>acs 04-002 looks like a CR
>>
>>
>
>I agree that acs04-141 is absolutely nothing for the reason you say;
>likewise for acs04-002.
>
>
>
>>022, 049, 188, didn't see anything so far
>>
>>
>
>022 is a residual right on the core of a galaxy in ours.
>
>049 is junk -- a hole in our reference, and should be ignored.
>
>188 is low signal to noise, but I still think it's real.
>
>-Rob
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 05 2004 - 21:01:20 PDT