From: Rachel G. (gibbo@panisse.lbl.gov)
Date: Mon Apr 05 2004 - 12:06:28 PDT
> Sounds good. It is likely I will be able to have the results back to by tomorrow
> morning my time.
Super!
> BTW, I know we ran into a lot of problems with guide stars in the search visits,
> but in general it usually isn't that bad. Assuming any orient will work for the
> ToOs we can usually find guide stars that will work. Of course having said that,
> this will be the first time it doesn't work out that way. :)
Fingers crossed. That's all we can do.
> BTW, I've looked at the guide stars for the 3rd search epoch. There are only a
> few visits that were problems, and all of them I was able to find some type of
> guide star with out using a different orient. I'll get the details to you once
> we are done with this up coming activation.
Sounds perfect, thanks.
More later!
> Bill
>
> >
> >Bill,
> >
> > Apologies. Yes, I was talking about guide stars. I
> >don't have any ToO + APT related questions at the moment.
> >
> > Thanks for the time estimate. I hope to get a low number
> >of candidates to you this afternoon then.
> >
> >Rachel
> >
> >On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, William Januszewski wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Rachel,
> >>
> >> I assume it is guide stars you are worried about? Five to ten candidates
> would
> >> be pretty difficult if you wanted it done before tomorrow afternoon. I could
> do
> >> two or three maybe. Getting a target to the point where guide star selection
> >> takes place can be quite time consuming.
> >>
> >> If it is something other then quide stars that you had in mind, let me know
> >> because I miss understood you.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Bill
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >Hi Bill,
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for writing! We do have candidates, but final
> >> >decisions haven't been made. We still have to collect a few
> >> >more photo-z's from Bahram Mobasher, and we're going discuss
> >> >candidates with Adam Riess today beginning at 3:30 pm your
> >> >time.
> >> >
> >> > How difficult would it be for you to check 5-10
> >> >candidates for us before we narrowed it down to < 5?
> >> >
> >> >Rachel
> >> >
> >> >On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, William Januszewski wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi Rachel,
> >> >>
> >> >> I've not yet head from you today, so I thought I would just touch base
> with
> >> you
> >> >> to see how things were coming along. I've assumed you would be activating
> >> 9727,
> >> >> if this isn't the case please let me know. If you have any questions don't
> >> >> hesitate to ask me.
> >> >>
> >> >> Cheers,
> >> >> Bill
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 05 2004 - 12:06:54 PDT