From: Natalia Kuznetsova (nvkuznetsova@lbl.gov)
Date: Sun Apr 04 2004 - 22:19:34 PDT
Hi Rob,
I've looked at fields C and D with both searchscan and ds9. It
really does appear that the small region at the edge (where the
candidate would be) is missing.
Natalia
Robert A. Knop Jr. wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 09:42:55PM -0700, Saul Perlmutter wrote:
>
>
>> It looks like we've been unlucky enough to find a candidate that's so
>>on the edge between two Subaru fields that it got cut off. I've been
>>looking at both fields, and matched the patterns in both, so I know
>>exactly where it should be. According to the GOODS image, too, it
>>should be at RA = 12:36:26. Unfortunately, Subaru field C's rightmost
>>edge is at 12:36:28.5 (and then it increases leftwards, of course), and
>>Subaru field D's leftmost field is at 12:36:25.9. At least that's
>>what it looks like in searchscan. So we are just missing the few
>>minutes we need.
>>
>>
>
>Look at both of those images anyway. The RA and Dec limits in
>searchscan are not perfect. It may be that the candidate is on the
>edge.
>
>-Rob
>
>
>
-- ______________________ Natalia Kuznetsova Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Road, MS 50R5032 Berkeley, CA 94720-8164 Tel: (510) 486-4877 FAX: (510) 486-7115 ______________________
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 04 2004 - 22:19:16 PDT