From: Robert A. Knop Jr. (robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu)
Date: Sun Apr 04 2004 - 21:44:40 PDT
On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 09:42:55PM -0700, Saul Perlmutter wrote:
> It looks like we've been unlucky enough to find a candidate that's so
> on the edge between two Subaru fields that it got cut off. I've been
> looking at both fields, and matched the patterns in both, so I know
> exactly where it should be. According to the GOODS image, too, it
> should be at RA = 12:36:26. Unfortunately, Subaru field C's rightmost
> edge is at 12:36:28.5 (and then it increases leftwards, of course), and
> Subaru field D's leftmost field is at 12:36:25.9. At least that's
> what it looks like in searchscan. So we are just missing the few
> minutes we need.
Look at both of those images anyway. The RA and Dec limits in
searchscan are not perfect. It may be that the candidate is on the
edge.
-Rob
-- --Prof. Robert Knop Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University robert.a.knop@vanderbilt.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 04 2004 - 21:45:05 PDT